... That's a lot of posts, huh. Oh well.
Omba link the relevant posts for me to read that you feel are fluffly and I'll get back to you on that.
FFFFF-
One fluff post, the one that got him under fire in the first place.
If you mean "besides sharing it and suggesting we lynch the towniest people", then I'd say use it at a later juncture when scum tries to pull 3-scum-teams after one of their members get lynched, making Town look for a phantom scum. Does that sate your curiousity?
It does.
If Schezo couldn't find anything, does your case then change? Is he still scum for prioritising making his presence known over simply lurking?
I'm not able to tell whether he
was unable to find anything, but the possibility has been noted; I think he
would have been able to, though. And yes, I still see it as scummy, just as before. It's a very weak tell
on it's own, however.
I never said I voted Bard for probing questions. I only said I voted him for dragging out that discussion for longer than needed.
Define longer than needed. Specifically, define difference between probing questions and dragging out.
I completely forgot about the PX case, sorry. I can give you that as a good case.
Nice Action Dan case btw, oh wait that was meant for Pesco. You only really added like one bit of information. Try adding a little bit more into the mix to see what you can make. With that last sentence, it seems as if you wanted to elaborate further but didn't have anything to go on. Perhaps now would be a good time to try?
Hero999(because Hero is much more catchy than Villian): Okay, I see what your views are on him. They make sense to me, I'll give you that.
->
You still look suspicious in my eyes though, so if I were you, I would try and make that better. (and be a little less aggressive too)
Suspicion why? Yes, I have read your previous posts. Yes, I'm still asking this question.
I didn't know stopping to answer your questions was scummy, especially when NO ONE HAD FUCKING POSTED on our spat at that time.
Seems I didn't word that clearly enough. To clarify: Didn't see motivation to find scum in the post where you voted ActionDan. Then didn't see this motivation in the reasoning you gave for that one post that initially got you voted (the fluffy one at RVS' end). The fact that you chose to use your time to respond to me instead of looking at the rest of the game is not something I see as scummy; it's something I might have done myself, as town. I see it as completely neutral.
No, look at your entire 121 and tell me it's not just copied. The only thing you added was an advice remark to Job and Dan, and that's it. What it's fine now since Pesco said it and you give him credit? Then what in the fuck is the point if you're reposting JUST to make so fucking noise?
Argh, the reason it's driving me up the wall is that your case on me is built on "Schezo made noise and nothing else" and then you proceed to make a post that mirrors this and screams hypocrisy to my ears. It's why it's bothering me so much that your backing it up.
It's not just copied (:V), which you will notice if you take a close look.
That's not the point, though. You're saying my case on you is built on "Schezo made noise and nothing else", but somehow fail to see that it's specifically the "nothing else" part that I see as scummy. I thought I explicitly made that clear multiple times, but it seems I didn't. In short: If that post of mine you linked was my only one, I would have pretty much been guilty of the same thing I accused you of. But, somehow,
it wasn't.
I taking from this, you're only looking at the logical aspects of the game and it has to be cut and dry, townie does this scum does that. I don't think you're taking into account grey areas and exceptions which are always bound to come up in this game.
I work with probabilities. But yes, I prefer to rely on the logical aspects and the intent I can read out of them, where possible. I
am taking into account all the shades of gray I can see, though.
Anyway. You've started to actually do things now. Not exactly liking how the probing others vs responding to others' cases on you is still tilted towards the latter, but since you were today's first huge wagon, I guess that's kind of to be expected, hence for the time being neutral; my view of this may change depending on how you act D2+. Which is to say you're no longer the one I want to dismember the most.
##UnvoteDislike Omba right now. The way he's attacking Schezo doesn't look like the way a townie method of pushing a case to me - he's not trying to convince other people that Schezo is scum, he's trying to convince Schezo that Schezo is scum and forcing Schezo to turtle in response. Pressuring townies into focusing only on defending themself instead of hunting scum makes sense as a scum ploy.
Uh. It also makes sense if what you're trying to do is get someone to proof his actions don't make him scum, then see if his explanations look town or not. And how is continuing to attack anything I see as in need of getting attacked a scum trait? What would you have me do instead?
I do not like how you only invoked meta for PX but disregard everyone else's meta.
Have you used meta for anyone besides Schezo so far? In your posts, that is.
Because I don't find him actively suspicious at the moment. I'll give him a deeper reread on D2.
Because I haven't really read his posts in-depth yet. Getting onto that in D2.
Do not like. If you plan to re-read his posts, that means you haven't done so enough to form a good opinion of him.
If you haven't done that, how the fuck do you plan to make a
good decision on whom to lynch
today.
The fuck.Schezo is loud, Schezo gets pressured, Schezo screams like a little girl, so let's not lynch the guy who was voted for being a lurker and stopped lurking, and instead vote someone who actually is.
Lynching a null-to-scum Lurker Day 1 would be just so ~novel~ I could get behind it if the people on him weren't making me twitch. Maybe that'll change. The day, she is still early. My vote, she screams to go where my GUT! feels something is out of place.
I'd rather lynch PX then either of them. No, not because he wants to wagon me, because I can't remember anything he's said today. It took me a minute to remember what his last post was.
What changed? I see you seem to have changed your opinion of Pesco at least somewhat. If your case on PX is he's lurking (I assume that's what you've meant here), does that mean there's no one else you'd like to kill more than the lurker (like Pesco before you changed your opinion of him)?
Also, please note that
this post of mine exists.
Now that that stuff is out of the way...
##Vote PXWhy hello thar Schezo#2. Lolcase on Dan doesn't cut it. Let's find things others have said about Shadoweh and make a case out of it doesn't cut it either. What little effort I'm seeing from you has not been spent on doing actually useful things. I'm not fond of lynching lurkers D1. I
do like lynching lurkers that behave like you do. Posting for the sake of posting is a surefire way to get your head ripped off by me.
Would lynch Dan if PX magically died before the day ended. Don't want to lynch Villain999 today anymore.
